Skip to main content

Team 3Thirty

Executive assistant selection criteria examples for government jobs

Executive assistant selection criteria examples for government jobs
In this guide

Executive assistant applications can sound remarkably similar: organised, discreet, able to manage a busy diary and comfortable with senior stakeholders. Those qualities matter, but a panel needs to see how you use them. Explain a situation where you had to make a judgement, coordinate several people or protect the quality of information going to an executive.

The fictional examples below show the level of detail you can include. They are practice responses to common executive-support themes, not a universal set of government selection criteria. Read the actual advertisement before deciding which examples and documents to prepare.

Check the document before you write

An NSW role may ask for a cover letter, targeted questions or another suitability statement. An APS role may ask for a pitch with a specified limit. The APSC application guide recommends relevant evidence and following the stated limits. The advertisement determines your submission.

Use our free job-ad guide to separate the documents requested from the skills you need to demonstrate. Then match each question to a strong example. A two-page letter needs a coherent account of suitability; several separate questions each need a direct answer.

Managing a diary with genuinely competing priorities

Practice criterion: Ability to organise work and manage competing priorities.

“As an executive assistant in a service organisation, I supported a director whose diary included operational reviews, stakeholder meetings and a recurring governance committee. On one occasion, an urgent briefing was requested for the same afternoon as two external meetings and the committee preparation session. I needed to establish what could move while preserving the director’s ability to make the briefing deadline.

“I confirmed the briefing deadline and the decision required, then reviewed the other commitments with the director. I identified which meetings required their attendance and which could proceed with a nominated delegate. I contacted the external offices to explain the proposed changes without disclosing the confidential reason for the briefing. I also checked when the director would need to review the papers and protected a preparation period in the revised diary.

“I updated the meeting arrangements, confirmed the delegate’s availability and sent the director a short summary of the changes and outstanding actions. The briefing was completed by the requested time, one meeting proceeded with a delegate and the remaining meeting was rescheduled with agreement. I learnt to make the consequences of each option clear before changing the diary, particularly where another person’s deadline depended on the director’s availability.”

This example explains how the applicant established priorities and obtained direction. It gives more useful evidence than saying they used Outlook or managed a complex calendar. Replace the circumstances with your own, including the decisions you could make independently.

Handling confidential information carefully

Practice criterion: Discretion and sound judgement when handling sensitive information.

“While coordinating papers for an internal review, I received a request for a document from a colleague who was supporting one of the attendees. The document included sensitive staffing information, and the request did not establish whether the colleague was authorised to receive the full paper. I checked the distribution instructions and asked the document owner to confirm the appropriate access before sending anything.

“I explained to the colleague that I was checking the approved distribution and gave them a realistic update time. The owner confirmed that a restricted extract would meet their preparation needs. I arranged for the approved extract to be provided through the usual secure location, checked that access was limited to the intended recipient and recorded the action in the meeting preparation notes. The colleague received the information needed for their task, and the full document remained within the authorised group.”

The judgement is visible in the checks, the communication and the controlled resolution. Keep your real example anonymous. You can describe why information was sensitive without revealing its contents or the people involved.

Coordinating papers and following up without creating confusion

Practice criterion: Strong written communication and stakeholder coordination.

“I coordinated the papers for a monthly management meeting involving six business areas. Several contributors were sending revised versions by email after the agreed deadline, which made it difficult to know whether the pack contained the final paper. I discussed the issue with the chair and proposed a clearer submission process for the next meeting.

“I sent contributors a schedule showing the due date, review period and the point at which the pack would be finalised. I used a central register to track the paper owner, version and approval status. When a paper was late, I contacted its owner directly to establish what was outstanding and whether it would affect a decision. I escalated the unresolved items to the chair with a short explanation of the impact, rather than forwarding a chain of emails.

“Before distribution, I checked the agenda against the approved papers and confirmed the links worked for the intended readers. The chair received the pack in time for review, and attendees used a consistent set of documents. After the meeting, I recorded actions with an owner and due date, then checked progress before the next cycle. The process gave contributors clearer expectations and made outstanding work easier to follow up.”

For senior executive support, explain the complexity of the office, the decisions supported and the boundaries of your authority. For a junior position, a smaller example can still be effective if it shows reliable coordination and careful checking.

Use transferable experience honestly

You may have relevant evidence from office administration, project support, hospitality management or customer service. Choose work that involved comparable demands: coordinating availability, handling private information, resolving conflicting requests or preparing accurate records. Explain the connection to executive support in a sentence after the example.

If you have never supported a senior executive, say what you have done and how it prepares you for the role. Avoid upgrading an ordinary task into responsibility you did not hold. A credible account of coordinating a complex roster is more useful than an invented claim about managing an executive office.

Our administration officer cover letter guide includes more support-role distinctions. The executive assistant APS application example shows how requirements can be organised around a particular advertised position; check its vacancy dates before using it as a job opportunity.

Turn the examples into your application

Select examples against the actual questions, then check that each answer explains your responsibility, the steps you took and the outcome. Remove repeated background. Use the saved space to explain a decision, a check or a conversation that made the work effective.

If the ad asks for a letter, use the NSW Government cover letter template as a starting structure. If it asks for an APS pitch, use the APS pitch template. The STAR method guide explains how to develop and shorten an evidence paragraph without losing the important actions.

If you have a role ready and want help preparing the full submission, our Complete Government Job Application service covers the written documents required for the accepted role, using your experience. The first step is the actual job advertisement so the work matches what you need to submit.

COMPLETE GOVERNMENT APPLICATION

Get your government application written for you

We prepare your CV and every written document the job ad requires, including a cover letter or targeted responses where requested. Your application is built around your real experience, ready for you to review and submit.

$497 incl. GST